FAQ: Are Third Party Vendor reviews required for SOC 1 and SOC 2?

FAQ: Are Third Party Vendor reviews required for SOC 1 and SOC 2?

As of the latest SSAE 18 and SOC 2 updates, vendor management and review of any relevant compliance / audit reports (SOC 1, SOC 2, HITRUST, ISO 27001/2, PCI, etc.) has become a key component of monitoring for potential security and compliance risks when outsourcing functions that use a third party’s data.

Additional FAQs

Are Representation Letters Required in SSAE 18?

Previously in SSAE-16 a Management Representation Letter was highly recommended and common practice, however, they were not explicitly required to be obtained except in certain existing subject matter sections. This

Are Third Party Vendor reviews required for SOC 1 and SOC 2?

As of the latest SSAE 18 and SOC 2 updates, vendor management and review of any relevant compliance / audit reports (SOC 1, SOC 2, HITRUST, ISO 27001/2, PCI, etc.)

What are the SOC 2 criteria?

The five SOC 2 criteria are Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.

SOC 1 or HITRUST?

The SOC 1 has a completely different purpose than HITRUST. Typically a company would perform both if they are a TPA processing medical claims and other claims, where, there is

Can I fail a SOC 2 audit?

Yes, failure to meet the relevant Trust Service Criteria may result in a failed SOC 2 audit, requiring remediation. This is known as a Qualified Opinion when this happens.

What is SSAE 18 (formerly SSAE 16)?

The SSAE 18 audit standard is a framework for reporting on an examination of controls at a service organization relevant to user entities’ internal control over financial reporting.

Get Our Emails

SOC Reporting Guide